As the COVID19 pandemic continues to spread and vaccinations are administered throughout the world at different rates and with different strategies, understanding the multiple aspects of the immune response to vaccinations is required to define more efficient vaccination strategies. To date, the duration of protection induced by COVID19 vaccines is still matter of debate. To assess whether 2-doses vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was sufficient to induce a persistent specific cellular immune response, we evaluated the presence of SARS-COV2 Spike-specific B and T lymphocytes in 28 healthcare workers 1 and 7 months after completing the vaccination cycle. The results showed that at 7 months after second dose a population of Spike-specific B lymphocytes was still present in 86% of the immunized subjects, with a higher frequency when compared to not-immunized controls (0.38% ± 0.07 vs 0.13% ± 0.03, p<0.001). Similarly, specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, able to respond in vitro to stimulation with Spike derived peptides, were found at 7 months. These results confirm that vaccination with BNT162b2 is able to induce a specific immune response, potentially long lasting, and could be helpful in defining future vaccination strategies.

Long lasting cellular immune response induced by mRNA vaccination. Implication for prevention strategies / Vitiello, L.; Gatta, L.; Ilari, S.; Bonassi, S.; Cristina, M.; Ciatti, F.; Fini, M.; Proietti, S.; Russo, P.; Tomino, C.; Limongi, D.. - In: FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-3224. - 13:(2022), pp. 1-9. [10.3389/fimmu.2022.836495]

Long lasting cellular immune response induced by mRNA vaccination. Implication for prevention strategies

Gatta L.;Ilari S.;Cristina M.;Fini M.;Tomino C.;Limongi D.
2022

Abstract

As the COVID19 pandemic continues to spread and vaccinations are administered throughout the world at different rates and with different strategies, understanding the multiple aspects of the immune response to vaccinations is required to define more efficient vaccination strategies. To date, the duration of protection induced by COVID19 vaccines is still matter of debate. To assess whether 2-doses vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was sufficient to induce a persistent specific cellular immune response, we evaluated the presence of SARS-COV2 Spike-specific B and T lymphocytes in 28 healthcare workers 1 and 7 months after completing the vaccination cycle. The results showed that at 7 months after second dose a population of Spike-specific B lymphocytes was still present in 86% of the immunized subjects, with a higher frequency when compared to not-immunized controls (0.38% ± 0.07 vs 0.13% ± 0.03, p<0.001). Similarly, specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, able to respond in vitro to stimulation with Spike derived peptides, were found at 7 months. These results confirm that vaccination with BNT162b2 is able to induce a specific immune response, potentially long lasting, and could be helpful in defining future vaccination strategies.
2022
b iymphocytes; covid-19; mrna vaccination; sars-cov2; t iymphocytes activation; bnt162 vaccine; humans; immunity cellular; rna; messenger; rna; viral; sars-cov-2; vaccination; covid-19; covid-19 vaccines
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Long lasting cellular immune response induced by mRNA vaccination. Implication for prevention strategies / Vitiello, L.; Gatta, L.; Ilari, S.; Bonassi, S.; Cristina, M.; Ciatti, F.; Fini, M.; Proietti, S.; Russo, P.; Tomino, C.; Limongi, D.. - In: FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-3224. - 13:(2022), pp. 1-9. [10.3389/fimmu.2022.836495]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Vitiello_Long-lasting_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 879 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
879 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1654035
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact